Prediction of Cation Exchange Capacity using fractal dimension of soil particle size distribution

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Cation exchange capacity (CEC) is one of the most important soil properties. This property can describe many of soil properties such as soil fertility, specific area and soil water content. Whereas measuring this property is expensive, time-consuming and laboratory tools needed, hence, prediction of CEC using pedotransfer function (PTF) and soil easily properties is very important in soil science studies. So, the objective of the present study was to develop regression pedotransfer functions to predict the CEC using fractal dimension of soil particles. Consequently, 106 soil samples of UNSODA dataset were used. Fractal dimension of soil particle size was calculated and then was used to develop a PTF to predict the soil CEC. Performance of suggested fractal regression was compared the existed functions that use other soil properties as input. Results showed that between all soil easily properties only fractal dimension, % clay and organic matter had a significant coefficient. Suggested fractal regression model (R2= 0.62, RMSE= 5.3 and ME= 0.004) and validation (R2= 0.59, RMSE= 5.4 and ME= 0.054) had a better performance that other functions including suggested function, Bell and Vankulen. With considering of good performance of the suggested fractal function, applying fractal dimension that shows effects of soil texture with a number is approved.

Keywords


Abbasi Y., Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B., Liaghat A. M., and Shorafa M. 2011. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve of saline and saline-alkali soils of Iran. Pedosphere, 21(2): 230-237.
Bayat H., Davatgar N., and Jalali M. 2014. Prediction of CEC using fractal parameters by artificial neural networks.  International Agrophysics, 28: 143-152.
Bell M. A., & Van Keulen H. 1995. Soil pedotransfer functions for four Mexican soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59(3): 865-871.
Breeuwsma A. J. H. M., Wosten J. H. M., Vleeshouwer J. J., Van Slobbe A. M., and Bouma J. 1986. Derivation of land qualities to assess environmental problems from soil surveys. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50(1): 186-190.
Fooladmand H.R. 2008. Cation Exchangeable Capacity estimation using some soil properties. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 1: 1-8. (In Persian)
Horn R., Fleige H., Richter F. H., Czyz E. A., Dexter A., Diaz-Pereira E., and De la Rosa D. 2005. SIDASS project: Part 5: Prediction of mechanical strength of arable soils and its effects on physical properties at various map scales. Soil and Tillage Research, 82(1): 47-56.
Huang G., and Zhang R. 2005. Evaluation of soil water retention curve with the pore–solid fractal model. Geoderma, 127(1): 52-61.
Keshavarzi A., Sarmadian F., Labbafi R., and Vandechali M. R. 2011. Modeling of soil cation exchange capacity based on fuzzy table look-up scheme and artificial neural network approach. Modern Applied Science, 5(1): 153.
Krogh L., Breuning-Madsen H., and Greve M. H. 2000. Cation-exchange capacity pedotransfer functions for Danish soils. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 50(1): 1-12.
Mehrbanian M., Mehrjerdi R., and Dehghani F. 2010. The efficiency of Transfer functions to estimate CEC of lime and plaster soils, Yazd province. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 17(1): 113-129. (In Persian)
Memarianfard M., and Beigi H. H. 2010. Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Regression Pedotransfer Functions Models for Prediction of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity in Chaharmahal-Bakhtiari Province. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 23(4): 90-99. (In Persian)
Mirzakhni R., Shabanpoor Shahrestani M., and Saadat S. 2005. Estimates of soil moisture characteristic curve by using transfer functions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 15(3): 151-162. (In Persian)
Schaap M. G. 2004. Accuracy and uncertainty in PTF predictions. Developments in Soil Science, 30 33-43.
Sepaskhah A. R., and Tafteh A. 2013. Pedotransfer function for estimation of soil-specific surface area using soil fractal dimension of improved particle-size distribution. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(1): 93-103.
Shirani H., and Rafienejad, N. 2012. Prediction of some difficult-to-measure soil characteristics using regression pedotransfer functions and artificial neural network in Kerman Province. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 25 (4): 349-359. (In Persian)
Stat Soft, I. N. C. 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. Tulsa, USA, 150.
Wagner, B., Tarnawski, V. R., Hennings, V., Muller, U., Wessolek, G. and Plagge, R. 2001. Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma, 102: 275–297.