Evaluation of the Performance of Copula Function in Estimating Some Soil Properties

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman,

2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Abstract

The study of spatial distribution of soil properties for optimal soil management and proper utilization of non-renewable soil resources is of particular importance. The copula function is one of the new interpolation techniques that are widely used in various sciences such as hydrology. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the spatial variation of some soil properties using the copula function and to compare with geostatistics techniques. Sampling by regular networking was done in a 484 ha area in the west of Baft city, Kerman province, and 121 surface soil samples were collected. After air drying and passing through a 2 mm sieve, the percentage of organic matter and clay were determined in soil samples. To interpolate, four functions of the Archimedean copula including the Clayton, Frank, Gumbel and Joe functions, and geostatistics techniques including simple kriging, ordinary kriging, universal kriging and disjunctive Kriging and the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method were used. The results were analyzed using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and Mean Bias error (MBE). In order to fit the copula function on the data, the distribution function of the studied variables was determined. The results showed that the distribution of each of the studied variables is different and is explained by different distribution functions. Also, with increasing distance, the value of correlation for all studied variables decreased so that after a distance of 2000 meters, they do not show any spatial correlation. Comparison of the Copula function and geostatistical techniques based on evaluation criteria showed that the Copula function had a better performance in estimating the studied variables and the estimation error for the Copula function were calculated less. In general, the results of this study showed that due to the skewed nature of soil data, Copula function have the ability to fully express the probabilistic dependence and can be considered in spatial studies.

Keywords

References

Aas K., Czado C., Frigessi A., and Bakken H. 2009. Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insurance: Mathematics and economics, 44(2): 182-198.
Ahmadi F., Radmanesh F., Parham G.A., and Mirabbasi Najafabadi R. 2017. Application of archimedean and extreme values copula functions for multivariate analysis of low flows in dez basin. Journal of Water and Soil, 31(4): 1031- 1045. (In Persian)
Bárdossy A. 2006. Copula-based geostatistical models for groundwater quality parameters. Water Resources Research, 42:1-12.
Bárdossy A., and Pegram G. 2014. Infilling missing precipitation records – A comparison of a new copula-based method with other techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 519, Part A (0): 1162-1170.
Daneshzadeh M., karami H., farzin S., sanikhani H., and Mousavi S.F. 2016. Bivariate analysis of meteorological drought in semnan using copula functions. Applied Research of Water Sciences. 2(3): 21-34. (In Persian)
Ganjalikhani M., Zounemat Kermani M., Rezapur M., and Rahnama M. 2016.  Evaluation of copula performance in groundwater quality zoning case study: kerman and ravar region. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 47(3): 551-560. (In Persian)
Gräler B., and Pebesma E. 2011. The pair-copula construction for spatial data: a new approach to model spatial dependency. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 7(0): 206-211.
Grimaldi S., and Serinaldi F. 2006. Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 29(8): 1155-1167.
Hofert M., Kojadinovic I., Maechler M., Yan J., and Nešlehová G. 2018. Copula: Multivariate Dependence with Copulas. R package (Version 0.999-19).
Jordana S.G., Jannourab R., Jordana G., Buerkerta A., and Joergensenb R.G. 2018. Spatial variability of soil properties in the floodplain of a river oasis in the mongolian Altay Mountains. Geoderma, 330: 99–106.
Karimi A., Moezzi A.A., Chorom M., and Enayatizamir N. 2019. Influence of Sugarcane bagasse biochar on nutrition availability and biological properties of a calcareous soil. Applied Soil Research, 8(1): 1-17. (In Persian)
Kitanidis, P. K. 1997. Introduction to Geostatistics: applications in hydrogeology, Cambridge University Press. UK, 247p.
Khosravi Y., and Abbasi E. 2016. Spatial Analysis of Environmental Data Using Geostatistics, 280p. (In Persian)
Kong X.M., Huang G.H., Fan Y.R., and Li Y.P. 2014. Maximum entropy- gumbel-hougaard copula method for simulation of monthly streamflow in Xiangxi River, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 14(2): 1-14.
Li J. 2010. Application of copulas as a new geostatistical tool. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Moazami S., Golian S., Kavianpour M.R., and Hong Y. 2014. Uncertainty analysis of bias from satellite rainfall estimates using copula method. Atmospheric Research, 137(0): 145-166.
Nelsen R.B. 2007. An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Series in Statistics. 2nd Edition. Springer. 272 p.
Oliver M.A., and Webster R. 2015. Basic Steps in Geostatistical: The Variogram and Kriging. Springer. 100 p.
Schmidt T. 2007. Coping with Copulas. In: Rank J. (Ed.), Copulas-From Theory to Application in Finance, Risk Books, London, pp. 3-34
Shafaei M., Fakheri Fard A., Dinpajouh Y., and Mirabbasi R. 2017. Modeling rainfall event characteristics using D-vine copulas. Journal Water and Soil Resources Conservation. 6(2): 46-58. (In Persian)
Walkley A.J., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37: 29–38.
Wilding L.P. 1985. Spatial Variability: Its Documentation Accommodation and Implication to Soil Surveys. In: Nielsen D.R. and Bouma J. (eds.) Soil Spatial Variability. Pudoc. The Netherlands. pp. 166–194.
Yaghmaeian Mahabadi N., Samiei K., Zavvareh M. and Rmezanpour H. 2019. Spatial variation of some soil properties and their relationships with tea yield in Fouman Region, Guilan. Applied Soil Research, 7(2): 82-96. (In Persian)
Applied Soil Research
Volume 10, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 82-97

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 13 March 2021
  • Accept Date: 03 April 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics