Vinasse Conditioner Effect Evaluation on Soil Loss and Runoff Component

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 SCWMRI

2 Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute

Abstract

Drylands have always been an important source of soil loss and sediment yield, so that suitable conditioner application can reduce soil erosion. This study conducted to determine the suitable rate of vinasse treatment in reducing runoff and soil loss on the loess soil of drylands in Kalaleh city, east of Golestan Province and in plots with 10 x 30 x 30 cm dimensions were done. This experiment had four treatments of vinas (0, 50, 100, and 150 ml) once at an average intensity of 70 mm per hour on three different slopes (20, 12, and 8 %) and once at three rainfall intensities (50, 70, and 90 mm/h) on a medium slope (12%) each with three repetitions for 30 minutes. Vinasse treatments were also sprayed evenly on the soil surface and given about 24 hours to balance with soil particles. Runoff was collected and volumetric measurement was done after precipitation. The remaining samples were dried. The soil losses was determined. The ANOVA results showed that differences between slope, rainfall and vinasse treatments and their effect were significant. However the treatments containing 50, and 150 ml vinasse had higher performance than the control in the component of runoff volume and soil loss. Of course, 100 ml vinasse treatment caused to reduce runoff volume and soil losses components. The effect of slope, unlike the intensity of precipitation, does not follow a specific trend, but the intensity of precipitation has a direct effect on the component of runoff volume and soil losses. In this experiment condition, the application of 100 ml vinasse could be effective in runoff volume and soil loss reduction. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Armengol J.E., Lorenzo R. and Fernández N. 2003. Use of vinasse dilutions in water as an alternative for improving chemical properties of sugar cane-planted vertisols. Cultivos tropicales, 24(3): 73-76.
Bayat R. 2015. Revision, completion and publishing of erosion and flood atlas for river basins of Iran. (Atrak basin). Final research report, SCWMRI. 157p. (In Persian)
Blake G.R. and Hartge K.H. 1986. Bulk Density. In: Klute A, (Ed.) Methods Of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical And Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Ed. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. American Society Of Agronomy And Soil Science Society Of America. Madison, WI. pp. 363-382
Chi L., Huerta E., Álvarez-Solís D., Kú-Quej V. and Mendoza-Vega J. 2020. Abundance and diversity of soil macroinvertebrates in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plantations under organic and chemical fertilization in Belize, 36: 1-19.
Gee G.W. and Bauder J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis hydrometer methods. In: Sparks DL. Et Al. (Eds). Method Of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society Of Agronomy And Soil Science Society Of America. Madison. WI. USA. pp. 383-411.
Ghavimi Panah M.H., Sadeghi S.H.R. and Younesi H. 2017. Role of superficial biochar mulch produced from dairy factory waste on infiltration and runoff in small experimental plots. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 48(4): 905-916. (In Persian)
Heidary J., Vaezi A. and Delavar M.R. 2021. Quantifying the effects of physicochemical soil properties on runoff and soil loss in rainfed wheat cultivation strips. Applied Soil Research, 9(3): 19-30. (In Persian)
Jiang Z., Li Y., Wei G., Liao Q., Su T., Meng Y., Zhang H. and Lu C. 2012. Effect of long-term vinasse application on physico-chemical properties of sugarcane field soils. Sugar Tech, 14: 412–417.
Julião L.G.F., Lima J.M.d., Dias Júnior, M.d.S., Oliveira G.C.d., Ribeiro B.T. and Magalhães C.A.D. S. 2011. Mechanical attributes and splash erosion in red-yellow latosol samples under vinasse effect. Science and Agrotechnology, 35(1): 19-27.
Kalehoei M., Kavian A., Gholami L. and Jafarian Z. 2019. Affectability of time to runoff and runoff coefficient in small laboratory plots to application of organic mulch. Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering, 13(47): 9-17. (In Persian)
Moran-Salazar R.G., Sanchez-Lizarraga A.L., Rodriguez-Campos J., Davila-Vazquez G., Marino-Marmolejo E.N., Dendooven L. and Contreras-Ramos S.M. 2016. Utilization of vinasse as soil amendment: consequences and perspectives. SpringerPlus, 5(1): 1007.
Morgan R.P.C. 2005. Soil Erosion and Conservation. Third edition. Blackwell Publishing.
Nelson D.W. and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total organic carbon and organic matter. In: Sparks DL. et al. (Eds). Method of Soil Analysis. Part 3. 3rd Ed. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America Madison WI. USA. pp. 961-1010.
Nelson R.E. 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. p. 181-197. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR. (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Pproperties. (2nd Ed). Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
Paye A.L. and Kenne H.R. 1986. Methods of soil analysis. Part2. Chemical and Mineralogical Properties, ASA and SSSA, USA.
Prado R., Caione G. and Campos C. 2013. Filter cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2013.
Rezapour S., Barin M., Asadzadeh F. and Nouri A. 2021. Assessment of the impact of organic and chemical amendments on some chemical indicators of saline-sodic soils. Applied Soil Research,  9(3): 31-42.
Ribeiro B.T., Lima J.M., Curi N. and Oliveira G.C. 2012. Electrochemical attributes of soils influenced by sugarcane vinasse. Bioscience Journal, 28(1): 25-32.
Ribeiro B.T., Lima J.M., Curi N. and Oliveira G.C.d. 2013. Aggregate breakdown and dispersion of soil samples amended with sugarcane vinasse. Scientia Agricola, 70(6): 435-441.
Sadeghi S.H.R., Sharifi Moghadam E., Khaledi Darvishan A. and Hazbavi Z. 2014. A review on the application of sugar-cane organic residue in soil and water resources management. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 2(6): 9-12. (In Persian)
 Sadeghi S.H.R., Hashemi Ariyan Z. and Karimi Z. 2015. Runoff generation and soil loss control using combined application of vermicompost and vinasse. Water Reuse, 2(1): 81-91. (In Persian)
 Sanchez-Lizarraga A.L., Arenas-Montaño V., Marino-Marmolejo E.N., Dendooven L., Velazquez-Fernandez J.B., Davila-Vazquez G. and Contreras-Ramos S.M. 2018. Vinasse irrigation: effects on soil fertility and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi population. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(11): 3256-3270.
Sharifi Moghaddam E., Sadeghi S.H.R. and Khaledi Darvishan A. 2015. small plot soil hydrologic components as affected by application of vinasse organic residue. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 45(4): 499-508. (In Persian)
Tejada M. and Gonzalez J.L. 2006. Effect of two beet vinasse forms on soil physical properties and soil loss. Catena, 68: 41-50.
Applied Soil Research
Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
December 2023
Pages 47-59

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 March 2022
  • Revise Date: 28 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 13 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics