تحقیقات کاربردی خاک

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

استفاده از تکنیک پرومته در ارزیابی بهکاشت اراضی برای انار و پسته در دشت میاندوآب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه ارومیه

2 عضو هیات علمی

چکیده

ارزیابی تناسب اراضی برای تعیین سازگاری اراضی برای نوع خاصی از کاربری‌ها استفاده می‌شود تا از اراضی متناسب با استعداد و پتانسیل تولید آنها استفاده شود. این تحقیق با هدف تعیین تناسب اراضی برای محصولات انار و پسته با استفاده از تکنیک PROMETHEE II در بخشی از منطقه میاندوآب انجام گرفت. منطقه مورد نظر دارای 11 سری خاک بود. در این ارزیابی، ابتدا معیارهای بافت خاک، اسیدیته خاک، شوری خاک، کربن آلی خاک، درصد سدیم تبادلی خاک و درصد آهک خاک، تعداد خانوار، جمعیت مرد، جمعیت زن، سطح سواد (باسواد، بی‌سواد)، شغل اصلی و سن تعیین شدند. سپس وزن معیارها با استفاده از روش آنتروپی شانون محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین وزن برای هر دو محصول متعلق به معیار درصد سدیم تبادلی و کمترین وزن متعلق به سن و شغل بود. سپس معیارهای وزن داده شده با استفاده از تکنیک PROMETHEE II تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد که برای هر دو محصول انار و پسته سری‌های خاک Su.Wt و Su با فی‌های به‌ترتیب 417/0 و 328/0 برای انار و 438/0 و 358/0 برای پسته مناسب‌ترین، درحالیکه سری‌های خاکCh و Fa.Wt با فی‌های به ترتیب 285/0- و 522/0- برای انار و 326/0- 478/0- برای پسته نامطلوب‌ترین سری‌های خاک در منطقه مورد نظر می‌باشند. همچنین 11/20 درصد منطقه دارای تناسب خیلی خوب، 6/23 درصد دارای تناسب خوب، 26/36 درصد دارای تناسب متوسط و 03/20 درصد دارای تناسب نامناسب برای کشت انار و همچنین 23/27 درصد منطقه دارای تناسب خیلی خوب، 9/23 دارای تناسب خوب، 87/38 دارای تناسب متوسط و 10 درصد منطقه نیز برای کشت پسته دارای تناسب نامناسب بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Using PROMOTHEE technique to evaluate the optimal land suitability for pomegranate and pistachio in Miandoab plain

چکیده [English]

Land suitability evaluation is technically explained as the assessment of land performance when used for a specified target, particularly to use them based on their capability and production potential. This study aimed to determine the suitability of lands for Pomegranate and Pistachio using PROMETHEE II techniques in an area located in the Miandoab region, Iran. Eleven soil series were found in the study area. To explain the land suitability, some criterions including soil texture, soil acidity, salinity, organic carbon, soil exchangeable sodium (%), soil carbonate calcium (%), the number of households, both male and female population, illiteracy and literacy education, main occupation and age were determined. Then the entropy-weight method, which is based on Shannon Entropy theory, was utilized. Results showed that exchangeable sodium was found with maximum weight while age and occupation had the minimal weight for the both crops. Next, weighted values of criteria were analyzed using the PROMETHEE II technique. The results showed that for both pomegranate and pistachio, Soil series of Su.Wt and Su were identified to have the highest potential for cultivation with proper phi 0.417 and 0.328 for pomegranate and 0.438 and 0.358 for pistachio, respectively, while Ch and Fa.Wt soil series were found as unsuitable series with proper phi -0.258 and -0.522 for pomegranate and -0.326 and -0.478 for pistachio, respectively. Also, about 20.11% of the region had very good suitability, 23.6% good, 36.26% moderate and 20.03% had poor suitability for pomegranate cultivation and 27.23% of the region had very good, 23.9% good, 38.87% moderate and 10% had poor suitability for pistachio cultivation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Land suitability
  • PROMETHEE II technique
  • Pomegranate
  • Pistachio
  • Miandoab region
مراجع
References
Semi-detailed of soil studies in Miandoab Plain. 2013. Western Azerbaijan province, Iran, Agricultural Research Institute of Iran, 160 p.
Akinci H., Ozalp A.Y., and Turgut B. 2013. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 97: 71-82.
Akram M., Malik M., Ashraf M., Saleem M., and Hussain M. 2007. Competitive seedling growth and K+/Na+ ratio in different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Pak J Bot, 39:2553-2563.
Albadvi A., Chaharsooghi S., and Esfahanipour A. 2007. Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operational Research, 177: 673–683.
Athawale V.M., and Chakraborty S. 2010, January. Facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. In Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, pp: 9-10.
Banaie M.H. 1998. Map of moisture and heat regimes in different parts of Iran. Institute of Soil and Water Tehran.
Besharati Kelaie, H. 1998. Effects of sulfur along with Thiobacillus species in the absorption of nutrients in the soil. MA thesis COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, Tehran University. (In Persian)
Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5): 464-465.
Bower C.A., Reitemeier R.F., and Fireman M. 1952. Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil science, 73(4): 251-262.
Chapman H.D. 1965. Cation-exchange capacity. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilanb), pp: 891-901.
Cifuentes F.R., and Lindeman W.C. 1993. Organic matter simulation of elemental sulfur oxidation in a calcareous soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(3): 727-731.
Chou T.Y., Lin W.T., Lin C.Y., Chou W.C., and Huang P.H. 2004. Application of the PROMETHEE technique to determine depression outlet location and flow direction in DEM. Journal of Hydrology volume, 287: 49-61.
Darvishian M. 1999. Pistachio cultivation, (translation), Future Publishing Institute, 272 p.
Jafari M., and Sarmadian F. 2003. Principles of soil and soil classification. Tehran University Press.
Kabir G., and Sumi R.S. 2014. Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: a case study from Bangladesh. Energy, 72: 717-730.
Khosrobeigi R., Anabestani A., Taghilu A., and Shamsodini. 2011. The sustainability of rural development using by multi-criteria decision CP contingency planning (Case Study: Villages city Komijan), Journal of Human Geography, 3(2): 34-45. (In Persian).
Mendas A., and Delali A. 2012. Integration of multicriteria decision analysis in GIS to develop land suitability for agriculture: Application to durum wheat cultivation in the region of Mleta in Algeria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 83: 117-126.
Murphy, B., 2014. W,(2014) Soil Organic Matter and Soil Function–Review of the Literature and Underlying Data. Department of the Environment, Canberra, Australia.
Nelson R. 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2(2): 181-196
Publication No. 510. 2009. Ministry of Agriculture, Planning and Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, 208p. (In Persian).
Qi Y., Wen F., Wang K., Li L., and Singh S.N. 2010. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and entropy weight decision-making based method for power network structure assessment, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(5):92-99.
Rhoades J. 1982. Soluble salts. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2(2): 167-179.
Thomas G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods, (methodsofsoilan3), pp. 475-490.
Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1): 29-38.
Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F. Shi G.H., and Zhang X.T. 2008. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system. Energy Policy, 36(10): 3823-3832.
Wu J., Sun J., Liang L., and Zha Y. 2011. Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 5162–5165.
Zare M., Ordookhani K., Emadi A., and Azarpanah A. 2014. Relationship Between Soil Exchangeable Sodium Percentage and Soil Sodium Adsorption Ratio in Marvdasht Plain, Iran. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biom. Res, 2(12): 2934-2939.
Zhang H. Gu CL. Gu LW and Zhang Y. 2010. The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy. A case in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Tourism Management, 32(2): 443-451.
Zhao X., Qi Q., and Li R. 2010. The establishment and application of fuzzy comprehensive model with weight based on entropy technology for air quality assessment. Symposium on Security Detection and Information Processing, 7(1): 217–222.
Zou Z.H., Yi Y., and Sun J.N. 2006. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5):1020-1023.
Zolekar R.B., and Bhagat V.S. 2015. Multi-criteria land suitability analysis for agriculture in hilly zone: Remote sensing and GIS approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 118: 300-321.
Zhang Y., Zhang H.W., Su Z.C., and Zhang C.G. 2008. Soil microbial characteristics under long-term heavy metal stress: a case study in Zhangshi wastewater irrigation area, Shenyang. Pedosphere, 18: 1–10.
تحقیقات کاربردی خاک
دوره 6، شماره 2
شهریور 1397
صفحه 43-57
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 دی 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 فروردین 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 فروردین 1396
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار