The role of environmental factors in the susceptibility of rangeland soils of West Azerbaijan Province to water erosion

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of watershed management

2 Department of Range & Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University

3 Department of Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University

10.30466/asr.2026.55782.1865

Abstract

Soil erodibility is influenced by environmental and management factors and serves as a critical quantitative and qualitative indicator for estimating soil loss potential. This parameter is essential for planning soil conservation strategies and prioritizing protective measures. This study aimed to identify the direct and indirect environmental variables affecting the soil erodibility index (K) in sub-watersheds of West Azerbaijan Province. A total of 131 soil samples were collected from representative rangeland sites across the province, with adequate spatial distribution, from the surface layer (0–20 cm). Soil properties, including sand, silt, clay, organic carbon, lime content, saturated moisture, pH, and electrical conductivity, were measured in the laboratory. Additionally, soil permeability class and structure were determined. Topographic characteristics, such as slope gradient, slope aspect, and elevation of sampling points, were recorded using a clinometer, azimuth meter, and Global Positioning System (GPS). Maps of temperature and precipitation distribution were generated using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method in ArcGIS 10.3.1, and corresponding values for sampling points were extracted. The soil erodibility factor (K) was calculated using the equation proposed by Wischmeier and Smith. Stepwise regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the soil erodibility factor (K) and environmental variables. Regression coefficients and steps were determined for environmental parameters, and the statistical significance of the regression model was assessed through analysis of variance (ANOVA) across four steps. Correlation coefficients for vegetation cover, precipitation, slope, and elevation with the soil erodibility factor (K) were calculated at each step. ANOVA results indicated that the model was significant at the 1% level, confirming its reliability. The student’s t-test was used to determine the constant and variable coefficients of the models. Standardized coefficients for vegetation cover, precipitation, slope, and elevation were -0.231, -0.203, 0.194, and -0.187, respectively. Vegetation cover showed the highest correlation (R = 0.320), while elevation showed the lowest correlation (R = 0.469) with the soil erodibility factor (K). The spatial distribution of the K factor was mapped using geostatistical techniques, with the IDW method selected due to its lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The K factor map indicated the highest erodibility in the northern regions of the province, corresponding to areas with excessive livestock grazing and reduced vegetation cover due to overgrazing.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amundson R., Berhe A.A., Hopmans J.W., Olson C., Sztein A.E., Sparks D.L. 2015. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348(6235), 1261071.
Bryan, R.B. 2000. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope. Geomorphology, 32(3-4): 385-415.
Charman P.E.V., Murphy B.W. 2000. Soils (their properties and management). Second edition, Land and Water Conservation, Oxford University Press, 461p.
Chappell A., Zobeck T.M., Brunner G. 2006. Using bi-directional soil spectral reflectance to model soil surface changes induced by rainfall and wind-tunnel abrasion. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102 (3-4): 328–343.
Ghosal K., Das Bhattacharya S. 2020. A review of RUSLE model. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 48(4): 689–707.
Habibpour K., Safari R. 2024. A comprehensive Guide to using SPSS in survey research (quantitative data analysis). Mobtakeran Publications.,866 p. (In Persian).
Kiani Harchegani M., Sadeghi S.H., Falahatkar S. 2019. Comparative analysis of soil erodibility factor in Shazand watershed. Eco-Hydro Journal, 6 (1): 153-163 (In Persian).
Liu H.L.T.W., Lei T.W., Zhao J., Yuan C.P., Fan Y.T., Qu L.Q. 2011. Effects of rainfall intensity and antecedent soil water content on soil infiltrability under rainfall conditions using the runoff on out method. Journal of Hydrology, 396(1-2): 24–32.
Mallick J., Al-Wadi H., Rahman A., Ahmed M., Abad Khan R. 2016. Spatial variability of soil erodibility and its correlation with soil properties in semi-arid mountainous watershed, Saudi Arabia. Geocarto International, 31(6): 661-681.
Nelson D.W., Somers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter, in: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3., Madison, USA, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., pp.961-1010.
Nwaogu C., Okeke O.J., Adu S.A., Babine E., Pechanec V., 2017. Land use land cover change and soil-gully erosion relationships: A study of Nanka, South-Eastern Nigeria using geoinformatics. Proceedings of GIS Ostrava: Dynamics in GIscience, 305-319p. Springer International Publishing.
Ostovari Y., Ghorbani-Dashtaki S., Kumar L., Shabani F. 2019. Soil erodibility and its prediction in semi-arid regions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65: 1688-1703.
Refahi H. Gh. 1996. Water Erosion and Control, No.1. Tehran University Press, 674 p (In Persian).
Rengasamy P., Greene R.S.B., Ford GW., Mehanni A.H. 1984. Identification of dispersive behavior and the management of red-brown earths, Australian. Journal of Soil Research, 22(4): 413-431.
Rhoades J.D. 1996. Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids, in: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Ser. 5.3., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, USA. pp. 417-436.
Ryan J., Estefan G., Rashid A. 2001. Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. 2nd ed., International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, 254p.
Singh M.J., Khera K.L., Santra, P. 2012. Selection of soil physical quality indicators in relation to soil erodibility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58(6): 657–672.
Tian Z., Liu, F., Liang, Y., Zhu, X. 2022. Mapping soil erodibility in southeast China at 250 m resolution: Using environmental variables and random forest regression with limited samples. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 10(1), 62-74.
Wang B., Zheng F., Römkens M.J.M., Darboux F. 2013. Soil erodibility for water erosion: A perspective and Chinese experiences. Geomorphology, 187: 1-10.
Wang G., Gertner G., Liu X., Anderson A. 2001. Uncertainty assessment of soil erodibility factor for revised universal soil loss equation. Catena, 46(1): 1-14.
Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D. 1978. Prediction Rainfall Erosion Losses. A Guide for Conservation Planning Agriculture. USDA, Agriculture Handbook, No. 537.
Yuan Jun Z., Mingan S. 2008. Spatial distribution of surface rock fragment on hill slopes in a small catchment in wind-water erosion crisscross region of the loess Plateau. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 51(6); 862-870.
Yu W., Jiang Y., Liang W., Wan D., Liang B., Shi Z. 2023. High-resolution mapping and driving factors of soil erodibility in southeastern Tibet. Catena, 220, 106725.
Zangiabadi M., Rangavar A., Refahi H.Gh., Shorafa M., Bihamta M.R. 2010. Investigation of the most Important Factors Affecting on Soil Erosion in Kalat Semi-Arid Rangelands. Journal of Water and Soil, 24(4): 737-744. (In Persian)
Zhu G., Tang Z., Shangguan Z., Peng CH., Lei Deng L. 2019. Factors affecting the spatial and temporal variations in soil erodibility of China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 124(3): 737-749.
Zhu X., Liang Y., Tian Z., Wang X. 2021. Analysis of scale-specific factors controlling soil erodibility in southeastern China using multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Catena, 199: 105131.