نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی (Ph.D.)، بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی (Ph.D.)، بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران.

چکیده

مدیریت مصرف نیتروژن (N) یکی از عوامل مهم در افزایش عملکرد و بهبود کیفیت محصول چغندرقند است. هدف از انجام این تحقیق، ارزیابی پاسخ گیاه چغندرقند به سه سطح کودی نیتروژن شامل مقدار مصرف بر مبنای آزمون خاک (125 کیلوگرم در هکتار)، 25 درصد کمتر و 25 درصد بیشتر از آن و چهار منبع کودی شامل اوره، نیترات آمونیوم و نیتروژن کندرها شامل اوره آغشته به گوگرد (تولید داخل) و اوره با پوشش گوگردی بودند. آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار، در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی میاندوآب استان آذربایجان غربی به مدت دو سال زراعی (87-1385) اجرا شد. نتایج نشان داد که سطوح کودی نیتروژن به‌طور معنی‌داری عملکرد ریشه، درصد قند و عملکرد شکر را تحت تاثیر قرار داده و بیش‌ترین مقدار این صفات با مصرف نیتروژن بر مبنای آزمون خاک بدست آمد. همچنین، غلظت نیتروژن برگ‌ها با افزایش سطوح کودی افزایش یافت. هیچکدام از عوامل مذکور تحت‌ تاثیر منابع کودی نیتروژن قرار نگرفتند. منابع کود نیتروژن بر نیتروژن معدنی (نیتروژن-نیتراتی و نیتروژن-آمونیومی) خاک تاثیر معنی‌داری داشتند. غلظت نیتروژن معدنی با افزایش سطوح کودی افزایش یافت. بیش‌ترین مقدار نیتروژن معدنی در تیمار مصرف نیتروژن بر مبنای آزمون خاک از منبع نیترات آمونیوم بدست آمد. از نتایج این تحقیق چنین استنباط می‌ شود که برای تامین نیازهای چغندرقند به نیتروژن، می‌توان از مصرف یکباره نیتروژن توصیه شده قبل از کشت از منابع کودی نیتروژن کندرها یا مصرف تقسیطی آن از منابع اوره یا نیترات آمونیوم استفاده نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Different Sources and Amounts of Nitrogen on Root Yield and Some Qualitative Characteristics of Sugar Beet

نویسندگان [English]

  • Aziz Majidi 1
  • Hosien Tabiehzad 2

1 Scientific Staff members (PhD), Soil and Water Research Department, Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resource Center of West Azerbaijan, Urmia, Iran.

2 Scientific Staff members (PhD), Soil and Water Research Department, Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resource Center of West Azerbaijan, Urmia, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Nitrogen management (N) is one of the important factors in improving root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris, L). Suitable source and rate of N fertilizer application are crucial to produce a high–yielding, high-quality sugar beet crop. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of sugar beet to three levels of nitrogen fertilizer including N application based on soil test (125 kg ha-1), 25% less and 25% more than that one and four N sources including Urea (U), ammonium-nitrate (AN) and two delayed-release N sources e.g. Urea soaked with sulfur (domestic production) and sulfur coated urea (SCU). A field experiment was carried out during 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 growing seasons at the Agricultural Experimental Station of Miandoab in West Azerbaijan, Iran. Plots were arranged in a factorial randomized complete block design with three replications. The results revealed that, N rates influenced significantly root and sugar yields and the superiority was to adding 125 kg ha-1 pertinent to soil-based-test rate treatment. N rates did not influence sugar beet response to N sources. The value of mentioned parameters was not affected by N sources. N sources had consistent effects on mineral N (N-NO3 and N-NH4) concentration in the soil. Mineral N content increased with increasing N rates. The highest amount of mineral N contents were measured in N rate applied based on soil test in the form of AN source. The obtained results are recommended by application of N entirely in pre-plant in the form of delayed-release sources or split application in the form of, Urea or AN.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sugar beet
  • sulfur coated urea
  • Urea
  • Nitrogen split application
Adams R.M., Farris P.J. and Halvorson A.D. 1983a. Sugar beet nitrogen fertilization and economic optima: Recoverable sucrose vs. root yield. Agronomy Journal, 75: 173-176.
Akiyama H., Yan X. and Yagi K. 2010. Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils. Meta- analysis. Global Change Biology, 16: 1837-1846.
Aliahaie M. 1998. Methods of Soil Analysis (Vol. 2). Soil and Water Research Institute, No. 1024, Tehran, Iran, 116p. (In Persian)
Boring T. and Gehl R. 2011. Delayed-release nitrogen fertilizer effects on sugar beet yield and quality. Available at: http://agbioresearch.msu.edu/saginawvalley/ res_report08/ delayedrelease_n_08. pdf.
Eckhoff J. L.A. and Flynn C.R. 2008. Sugar beet response to nitrogen under sprinkler and furrow irrigation. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 45: 19-29.
Emami A. 1994. Methods of Plant Analysis (Vol. 1). Soil and Water Research Institute, No. 982, Tehran, Iran, 128p. (In Persian)
Garcia C., Vallejo A. A.D.J., Garca L. and Cartagena M. C. 1997. Nitrogen use efficiency with the application of controlled release fertilizers coated with Kraft pine lignin. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 43: 443-449.
Hoffmann C.M. and Mirlinder B. 2005. Composition of harmful nitrogen in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), amino acids, betaine, nitrate as affected by genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 22: 255-265.
Jaggard K.W., Qi A., and Armstrong M. J. 2009. A meta-analysis of sugar beet yield responses to nitrogen fertilizer measured in England since 1980. Journal of Agriculture Science, 147: 287-301.
Khan M. 2013. Sugarbeet production guide. Available at: www.sbreb.org.
Lamb J.A., Bredehoeft M.W., and Dunsmore C. 2011. Nitrogen management strategies for increasing sugar beet root quality Available at: http://www.sbreb.org/research/soil/soil11/N management Lamb.pdf.
Malnou C.S., Jaggard K. W., and Sparkes D.L. 2006. A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop. European Journal of Agronomy, 25: 254-263.
Malnou C.S., Jaggard K.W., and Sparkes D.L. 2008. Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. European Journal of Agronomy, 28: 47-56.
Marchetti R. and Castelli F. 2011. Mineral nitrogen dynamics in soil during sugar beet and winter wheat crop growth. European Journal of Agronomy, 35:13-21.
Nemeat Alla E.A. E. 2001. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by sources, levels and time application of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Agriculture Research, Tanta University, 27: 450-462.
Norton J.B. 2011. Nitrogen source, timing, and rate alternatives for furrow-irrigated sugarbeet. Online. Crop Management Doi. 2011; 10.1094/CM-2011-0829-01-RS.
Pospisil M., Pospisil A., and Rastija M. 2000. Effect of plant density and nitrogen rates upon the leaf area of seed sugar beet on seed yield and quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 12: 69-78.
Saif L.M. 1991. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by nitrogen sources and rate of some microelements in Kafr El-Sheikh. Ph. D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain. Shams University.
Shaviv A. 2001. Advances in controlled-release fertilizers. Advances in Agronomy. 71: 1-49..
Sims A. L. 2010. Challenging current nitrogen recommendations: Sugar beet response to nitrogen in different RRV locations and soils - Report 2. In: 2009 Sugar beet Research and Extension Reports, 40: 87-98.
Stevens W.B., Blaylock A. D., Krall J. M., Hopkins B. G. and Ellsworth J. W. 2007. Sugar beet yield and nitrogen use efficiency with pre-plant broadcast, banded, or point-injected nitrogen application. Agronomy Journal, 99: 1252-1259.
Stevens W.B., Violett R. D., Skalsky S. A. and Mesbah A.O. 2008. Response of eight sugar beet varieties to increasing nitrogen application: I. Root, sucrose, and top yield. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 45: 65-83.
Timilsena Y.P., Adhikari R., Casey P., Muster T., Gill H. and Adhikari B. 2015. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. Journal the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95: 1131-1142.
Vamerali T., Guarise M., Ganis A. and Mosca G. 2009. Effects of water and nitrogen management on fibrous root distribution and turnover in sugar beet. European Journal of Agronomy, 31: 69-76.
Wilson R.G., Smith J.A. and Miller S.D. 2001. Sugar beet production guide. Cooperation Extension Bulletin. EC01-156. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Zalat S.S. 1993. Effect of some cultural practices on sugar beet. PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University.
Ziaeyan A., Niromand Jahromi M., and Noshad H. 2011.  Sugar beet response to the application of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers. Journal of Sugar Beet, 27: 85-99. (In Persian)