بررسی واکنش لاین های خویش آمیخته نوترکیب آفتابگردان به تنش کلرید سدیم در مرحله گیاهچه ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اصلاح نباتات، گروه اصلاح و بیوتکنولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه

2 دانشیار گروه اصلاح و بیوتکنولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه (مکاتبه کننده)

3 استادیار گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه مراغه

4 استادیار گروه علوم خاک دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه

5 استادیار گروه زیست شناسی، دانشکده علوم دانشگاه ایلام

چکیده

به­منظور بررسی واکنش لاین­های خویش آمیخته نوترکیب آفتابگردان به تنش شوری در مرحله گیاهچه­ای، آزمایشی به­صورت فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در شرایط کنترل شده اجرا گردید. فاکتور اول شامل 77 لاین خویش آمیخته نوترکیب (نسل F9) به همراه والدین و فاکتور دوم تنش شوری NaCl با سطوح شوری صفر و 6 (دسی­زیمنس­بر­متر) و صفات مورد مطالعه شامل طول ریشه­چه و ساقه­چه، وزن تر ریشه­چه و ساقه­چه و وزن خشک ریشه­چه و ساقه­چه بود. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد تمامی صفات مورد مطالعه تحت تأثیر ژنوتیپ، شوری و اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ و شوری قرار گرفتند. از مجموع 77 لاین، 43% (33 لاین) در سطح شوری 6 دسی­زیمنس­بر­متر قادر به جوانه زنی نبودند و 57% (44 لاین) قدرت زنده­مانی خود را حفظ کردند. میانگین تمام صفات مورد مطالعه در سطح شوری 6 دسی­زیمنس بر­متر در مقایسه با شرایط عادی کاهش نشان داد. خوشه­بندی لاین­های مورد مطالعه با در نظر گرفتن جمیع صفات در هر یک از دو شرایط تنش شوری و عادی با محاسبه فواصل مربع اقلیدسی (Squard Euclidean) و روش Ward انجام شد. لاین­ها در 3 خوشه گروه­بندی شدند. در شرایط بدون تنش در خوشه اول، دوم و سوم به ترتیب 17، 18 و 42 لاین و در شرایط تنش شوری به ترتیب 26، 8 و 9 لاین در خوشه­های مربوطه قرار گرفتند. بیشترین فاصله بین خوشه­های 1 با 2 مشاهده شد. نتایج تجزیه خوشه­ای در تطابق با نتایج حاصل از تجزیه به مؤلفه­های اصلی و تجزیه تابع تشخیص بود. لاین C86 برای اکثریت صفات مورد بررسی دارای بیشترین میانگین بود و به عنوان متحمل­ترین لاین به تنش شوری معرفی می­شود. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation on the reaction of sunflower recombinant inbred lines to NaCl stress at seedling stage

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fariba Morsali Aghajari 1
  • Reza Darvishzadeh 2
  • Hamid Hatami Maleki 3
  • Mohsen Barin 4
  • Ali Asghar Hatamnia 5
1 MSc Student, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Urmia, Urmia, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Scinece, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In order to investigate the reaction of sunflower recombinant inbred lines to salt stress in seedling stage, a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design was implemented in controlled condition. The first factor consisted of 77 recombinant inbred lines (generation F9) and the second factor was salinity stress with NaCl (salinity levels 0 and 6 dS m-1) and traits including shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight and root dry weight were measured. Results of analysis of variance revealed that all studied traits influenced by genotype, salinity and genotype×salinity interaction. 33 lines out of 77 lines (43%) in salinity level of 6 dS m-1 could not germinate and 44 lines out of 77 lines (57%) could maintain their viability. Mean values of all of studied traits were decreased in salinity level of 6 dS m-1 compared to normal conditions. Clustering of genotypes was performed using the studied traits in each condition by squared Euclidean distance criteria and Ward algorithm. Studied lines were grouped in three classes. In normal conditions, 17, 18 and 42 lines were located in cluster one, two and three, respectively, while, in salinity conditions, 26, 8, and 9 lines were classified in above mentioned groups. Maximum distance was observed between cluster 1 and cluster 2. Results of cluster analysis were in coincidence with those obtained by principle component analysis and discriminant function analysis. Line C86 was possessed maximum values of studied traits and hence, present as salinity tolerant line.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cluster analysis
  • Salt stress
  • Seedling growth
  • Sunflower

مراجع

References
Afkar S, Karimzadeh G and Jafari AA. 2009. Morphological variation in seed yield and its components in a number of genotypes fescue (Festuca arundinacea L.) using multivariate statistical techniques. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 40: 151- 160 (in Persian).
Akram MS, Athar HUR and Ashraf M. 2007. Improving growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by foliar application of potassium hydroxide (KOH) under salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39: 769- 776.
Ashraf M and Harris PJC. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science Journal, 166: 3– 16.
Ashrafijou M, Sadat Noori SA, Izadi Darbandi A and Saghafi S. 2010. Effect of salinity and radiation on proline accumulation in seeds of canola (Brassica napus L.). Plant, Soil and Environment, 56: 312- 317.
Bert PF, Dechamp-Guillaume G, Serre F, Jouan I, De Labrouhe DT, Nicolas P and Vear F. 2004. Comparative genetic analysis of quantitative traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 3. Characterisation of QTL involved in resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Phomamacdonaldii. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109: 865– 874.
Bunyamin Y, Yaser F, Oz Pay T, Turkozu D, Terziodlu O and Tamkoc A. 2008. Variations in response to salt stress among field pea genotypes (Pisum sativum Sp. Arvense L.). Journal Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7: 907- 910.
Bybordi A and Tabatabaei J. 2009. Effect of salinity stress on germination and seedling properties in canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 37: 71- 76.
Carlos EBDA, Prisco JT, Nogueria ARC, Bezerra MA, Lacerda CFD and Filho EG. 2008. Physiological and biological changes occurring in dwarf-cashew seedling subjectedto salt stress. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20: 105- 118.
Chauhan RR, Chaudhary R, Singh A and Singh PK. 2012. Salt tolerance of Sorghum bicolor cultivars during germination and seedling growth. Research Journal Recent Science, 1: 1- 10.
Choukr AR. 1996. The potential halophytes in the development and rehabiliation of arid and semiarid zones. In: Malcolm CV and Atef Hamdy (eds). Halophytes and Biosaline Agriculture, pp:3-13.
Darvishzadeh R, Alavi R and Sarrafi A. 2010. Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum DC.) in oriental and semi-oriental tobacco germplasms under field condition. Crop Improvement Journal, 24: 122- 130.
Darvishzadeh R, Poormohammad Kiani S, Dechamp- Guillaume G, Gentzbittel L and Sarrafi A. 2007. Quantitative trait loci associated with isolate specific and isolate nonspecific partial resistance to Phoma macdonaldii in sunflower. Plant Pathology, 56: 855– 861.
Dashti H, Naghavi MR and Tajabadipour A. 2010. Genetic analysis of salinity tolerance in a bread wheat cross. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technological, 12: 347- 356 (in Persian).
Davar R, Darvishzadeh R, Majd A, Gousta Y and Sarrafi A. 2010. QTL mapping of partial resistance to basal stem rot in sunflower using recombinant inbred lines. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 49: 330–341.
Faraghei Sh, Farshadfar M and Farshadfar E. 2007. Study of chemical composition and nutrition value of perennial Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and genetic diversity based on SDS- PAGE marker. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 15: 196- 210.
Gepts P. and Papa R. 2003. Possible effects of (trans) gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environment Biosafety Research, 2: 89-103.
Hailu F, Merker A, Singh H, Belay G, Johansson E. 2006. Multivariate analysis of diversity of tetraploid wheat germplasm from Ethiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evolution, 54: 83- 97.
Hatami-Maleki H, Karimzadeh G, Darvishzadeh R and Alavi R. 2012. Genetic variation of oriental tobaccos using multivariate analysis. Iran Field Crop Research, 10: 100-106 (in Persian).
Hu J, Seiler G and Kole C. 2010. Genetics, genomics and breeding of sunflower. Routledge, USA, 342 p.
Hussain SA, Akhtar J, Anwar-ul-haq M and Ahmad R. 2011. Growth, yield and ionic concentration of two sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes exposed to brackish water irrigation. Soil and Environment, 30: 58-65.
Jamil M, Lee DB, Jung KY, Ashraf M, Lee SC and Rha ES. 2006. Effec of salt (NaCl) stress on germination and early seedling growth of four vegetables species. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7: 273-282.
Jaynes DB, Kaspar TC, Colvin TS and James DE. 2003. Cluster analysis of spatiotemporal corn yield patterns in an Iowa field. Agronomy Journal, 95: 574-586.
Kader MA and Jutzi SC. 2004. Effects of thermal and salt treatments during imbibition on germination and seedling growth of sorghum at 42/19˚C. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190: 35-38.
Kajhpour M. 2006. Industrial plants, second edition. IsfahanUniversity Jihad Unit, 250p (in Persian).
Karimi N, Soheilikhah Z, Ghasmpour HR and Zebarjadi AR. 2011. Effect of salinity stress on germination and early seedling growth of different safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Journal of Ecobiotechnology, 3: 7-13.
Khan MM, Iqbal MJ, Abbas M, Raza H, Waseem R and Ali A. 2004. Loss of vigour and viability in aged onion (Alliumcepa L.) seeds. International Journal of Agriculure and Biology, 6: 708–711.
Khan MA and Gulzar S. 2003. Germination responses of Sporobolus ioclados: A saline desert grass. Journal of Arid Environment, 55: 453–464.
Khatoon A, Qureshi MS and Hussain MK. 2000. Effect of salinity on some yield parameters of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). International Journal Agriculture Biology, 4: 382–384.
Kholghi M, Bernousi I, Darvishzadeh R, Pirzad A, Hatami H. 2011. Collection, evaluation and classification of Iranian confectionary sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) populations using multivariate statistical techniques. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 5444-5451.
Leon AJ, Rufener GK, Berry ST and Mowers RP. 1995. Use of RFLP markers for genetic linkage analysis of oil percentage in sunflower seed. Crop Science, 35:558-564.
Manchanda G and Garg N. 2008. Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 30: 595-618.
Mass EV and Hoffman GJ. 1997. Crop salt tolerance current assessment. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, 103: 115-134.
Meloni DA, Gulotta MR and Martinez CA. 2008. Salinity tolerance in Schinopsis quebracho colorado: Seed germination, growth, ion relations and metabolic responses. Journal of Arid Environment, 72: 1785-1792.
Micic Z, Hahn V, Bauer E, Schon CC and Melchinger AE. 2005. QTL mapping of resistance to Sclerotinia mid-stalk rot in RIL of sunflower population NDBLOSsel×CM625. Theoretical Applied. Genetics, 110: 1490–1498.
Mohammadi SA and Prasanna BM. 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science, 43: 1235-1248.
Mohammad Doust Chamanabad H, Nouri Ghanbalati GH, Asghari A and Nouri Ghanbalati AL. 2010. Wheat from production to consumption. MohagheghArdabiliUniversity Press, 352p. (in Persian).
Moreda AP, Fisher A and Hill SJ. 2003. The classification of tea according toregion of origin using pattern recognition techniques and trace metal data. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 16: 195-211.
Nasir Khan M, Siddiqui MH, Mohammad F, Mansoor M, Khan A and Naeem M. 2007. Salinity induced changes in growth, enzyme activities, photosynthesis, prolin accumulation and yield in linseed genotypes. World Journal of Agriculture Science, 5: 685-695.
Noor E, Azhar FM and Khan AL. 2001. Differences in responses of Gossypium hirsutum L. varieties to NaCl salinity at seedling stage. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 3: 345- 347.
Noori SA and Sokhansanj A. 2008. Wheat plants containing an osmotin gene show enhanced ability to produce roots at high NaCl concentration. Russia Journal of Plant Physiology, 55: 256-258.
Noori SA, Ferdosizadeh L, Izadi-Darbandi A, Mortazavian SMM and Saghafi S. 2011. Effects of salinity and laser radiation on proline accumulation in seeds of spring wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology Breeding, 1: 11-20.
ParidaAK and Das AB. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicolology and Environmental Safety, 60: 324-349.
Rabii B and Rahimi M. 2009. Evaluation methods of canola genotypes grouped using the Fisher linear detection function. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Natural Resources, 47: 529-15.
Rauf M, Munir M, Hassan MU, Ahmad M and Afzal M. 2007. Performance of wheat genotypes under
osmotic stress at germination and early seedling growth stage. Africa Journal of Biotechnology, 6: 971-975.
Rachid Al-Chaarani G, Roustaee A, Gentzbittel L, Mokrani L, Barrault G, Dechamp-Guillaume G and Sarrafi A. 2002. A QTL analysis of sunflower partial resistance to downy mildew (Plasmopara halstedii) and black stem (Phoma macdonaldii) by the use of recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104: 490–496.
Saburi H, Nahvi M, Torabi A and Kanoni M. 2008. Classification of rice varieties at different levels from the osmotic potential of sorbitol based on cluster analysis and fisher linear functions. Iranian Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 28-30 August, Karadj, Iran, Crop Science and Society, 7: 327-340 (in Persian).
Sadat Noori SA, Ferdosizadeh L, Izadi-Darbandi A, Mortazavian SMM and Saghafi S. 2011. Effects of salinity and laser radiation on proline accumulation in seeds of spring wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 1: 11-20.
Safari P, Honarnejad Rand Esfahani M. 2008. Assessment of genetic variation in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars using canonical discriminant analysis. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Research, 6: 327-334 (in Persian).
Schabes FI and Sigstad EE. 2005. Calorimetric studies of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seed germination under saline stress conditions. Thermochimca Acta, 428: 71–75.
Shahsevand Hassani H. 2000. The process of production new allopeloeid Tritipyrum. 6th  Iranian Crop Science Congress Babolsar, pp: 22-24. (in Persian).
Singh BD. 2001. Plant breeding: principles and methods Kalyani publisher. 898 p.
Soltani A, Galeshi S, Zenali E and Latifi N. 2001. Germinatin seed reserve utilization and growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Science and Technology, 30: 51-60.
Seiler G and Jan CC. 2010. Basic information. In: Hu J, Seiler G. and Kole C (eds). Genetics genomics and breeding of sunflower, pp: 1-50.
Stuber CW. 1994. Heterosis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding Review, 12: 227-251.
Tuncturk M, Tuncturk R, Yildirim B and Ciftci V. 2011. Changes of micronutrients, dry weight and plant development in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars under salt stress. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 3726-3730.
Upadhyaya HD, Reddy LJ, Dwivedi SL, Gowda CLL, Singh S. 2009. Phenotypic diversity in cold-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 165: 279-291.
Wang W, Vinocur B and Altman A. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Plantarum, 218: 1–14.
Zhang ZH, Qu XS, Wan SH, Chen LH and Zhu YG. 2005. Comparison of QTL controlling seedling vigour under different temperature conditions using recombinant inbred lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany, 95: 423-429.
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 بهمن 1392
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 فروردین 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 19 شهریور 1393

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار