تحقیقات کاربردی خاک

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

سینتیک واجذب کادمیم در حضور کمپوست پوست نرم بادام و بیوچار آن در خاک آهکی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان ، بخش علوم و مهندسی خاک، کرمان، ایران.

2 استاد گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

چکیده

کادمیم یکی از رایج­ترین و خطرناک­ترین آلودگی­های محیط زیست می­باشد. اثر کمپوست پوست نرم بادام و بیوچار آن برسینتیک واجذب کادمیم در یک خاک آهکی در مزرعه دانشکده کشاورزی شهید باهنر کرمان بررسی شد. به همین منظور از کمپوست و بیوچار پوست نرم بادام در سه سطح (صفر، 2 و 4 درصد وزنی) استفاده شد که به خاک آهکی آلوده با سطوح صفر، 40 و 80 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم کادمیم افزوده گردید. نمونه­برداری از خاک­های تیمار شده، 45 و 90 روز بعد از آلوده شدن خاک­ها با کادمیم، انجام شد. در دوره­های زمانی مختلف از 5 تا 2880 دقیقه به وسیله EDTA عصاره­گیری شدند و غلظت کادمیم موجود در نمونه­ها تعیین گردید. نتایج نشان داد که کاربرد کمپوست و بیوچار پوست بادام باعث کاهش واجذب کادمیم نسبت به تیمار شاهد شد، کمترین میزان واجذب کادمیم در خاک، در سطح 4 درصد وزنی بیوچار و کمپوست رخ داد، در حالیکه بیوچار بیشترین کاهش را در میزان واجذب کادمیم در مقایسه با کمپوست داشت. براساس نتایج حاصل از آزمایش، واجذب کادمیم در تمامی تیمارها در زمان­های اولیه بیشترین مقدار بود و با گذشت زمان کاهش یافت. به عبارت دیگر 50 درصد واجذب کادمیوم در 2 ساعت اولیه رخ داد. در نمونه­برداری­های 90 روزه در مقایسه با 45 روزه، واجذب کادمیم از خاک بیشترین کاهش را نشان داد. براساس ضریب تبیین و خطای استاندارد بهترین معادله تابع توانی به عنوان بهترین معادله پیش­بینی کننده روند سینتیک واجذب کادمیم در خاک مورد مطالعه می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Cadmium Desorption Kinetics in the presence of the soft Almond Husk Compost and Biochar in a Calcareous Soil

نویسندگان [English]

  • zahra dianat maharluei 1
  • Majid Fekri 2

1 Agriculture Faculty, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Department of Soil Science, Kerman, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

چکیده [English]

Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most common and dangerous environmental contaminants. The effect of soft almond husk compost and its biochar was studied in the kinetic of cadmium desorption on a calcareous soil in the field of Shahid Bahonar Agricultural College, Kerman. For this purpose, compost and biochar of soft almond husk were used in three Levels (0, 2 and 4 % w/w) and were added to calcareous soil contaminated with three levels of cadmium (0, 40 and 80 mg kg-1). Sampling from treated soils was carried out 45 and 90 days after the contamination of soils with cadmium. Samples from treated soils were extracted by EDTA in 5 to 2880 minutes in different periods of time and the concentrations of cadmium were measured. The results showed that the application of compost and soft almond husk biochar reduced the desorption of cadmium compared to the control. The lowest amount of cadmium desorption occurred at level 4% w/w biochar and compost, while biochar had the highest reduction amount in the desorption of cadmium compared to the soft almond husk compost. Based on the experimental results, the cadmium desorption was highest in all treatments at initial times and decreased over the time. In other words, 50% of cadmium desorption occurred in the first 2 hours. In 90-day sampling compared to 45-day one, cadmium desorption from soil showed the highest decrease. Based on the determination of coefficient and standard error, the power function equation is considered as the best predictor of the cadmium release kinetics trend in the studied soil.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Almond soft skin
  • Desorption kinetics
  • Cadmium
  • Compost
  • kinetic equation
مراجع
Akoto O., Ephraim J.H., and Darko G. 2009. Heavy metals pollution in surface soils in the vicinity of abundant railway servicing workshop in kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2: 359-364.
Allison L.E., and Moodie C.D. 1965. Carbonate. In: Page C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2, American. Society, Agronomy, Madison. WI, pp. 1379-1396.
Bremner J.M. 1996. Nitrogen Total. In: Page D.L. Sparks et al., (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, part 3-American, Society, Agronomy, Madison. WI, pp. 1085 – 1122
Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54: 464-465.
Cao X., Ma L., Liang Y., Gao B., and Harris W. 2011. Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar. Environmental Science and Technology, 45: 4884-4889.
Chapman H.D., and Pratt P.F. 1961. Method of Analysis for Soils, plants and waters, University of California, Division of agricultural Sciences, pp. 60- 68.
Chapman H.D., and Pratt P.F. 1965. Methods of Analysis for Soils, plants, and waters, University of California, DivisionofAgricultureScience, pp. 56-61.
  Dang Y.P., Dalal R.C., Edwards D.G., and Tiller K.G. 1994. Kinetics of zinc desorption from vertisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 1392-1399.
Esfandbod M., Adhami E., Rashti M.R., and Esfandbod M. 2010. Kinetics of cadmium desorption from some soils of Iran. In: 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Australia, Brisbane, 235p.
Ghasemi-Fasaei R., and Jarrah M. 2013. Adsorption kinetics of cadmium and zinc as influenced by some calcareous soil properties. International journal of agriculture and crop sciences, 5: 479-483.
Gul S., Whalen J.K., Thomas B.W., Sachdeva V., and Deng H. 2015. Physicochemical properties and microbial responses in biochar amended soils: Mechanisms and future directions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 206: 46-59.
Hall G., Woodborne S., and Scholes M. 2008. Stable carbon isotope rations from archaeological charcoal as palaeoenvironmental indicators. Chemical Geology, 247: 384-400.
Helmke P.A., and Sparks D.L. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium. In: D.L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 551-574.
Jalali M., and Rostaii L. 2011. Cadmium distribution in plant residues amended calcareous soils as a function of incubation time. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 57: 137-148.
Kandpal G., Srivastava P.C., and Ram B. 2005. Kinetics of desorption of heavy metals from polluted soils: Influence of soil type and metal source, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 161: 353-363.
Karaca A. 2004. Effect of organic wastes on the extractability of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in soil, Geoderma, 122: 297-303.
Khan M.S., Zaidi, A. Oves, M. and Wani P.A. 2008. Heavy metal toxicity to legumes. In: Samuel EB, William CW (Eds) Heavy metal pollution. Nova Science, Hauppauge, pp. 197–225.
Kim H.S., Kim K.R., Kim H.J., Yoon J.H., Yang J.E., Ok Y.S., Owens G., and Kim K.H. 2015. Effect of biochar on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in agricultural soil. Environmental Earth Science, 74:1249–1259.
Krishnamurti G.S.R., Huang P.M., and Kozak L.M. 1999. Sorption and desorption kinetics of cadmium from soils: Influence of phosphate. Journal of Soil Science, 164: 888-898.
Lehmann J., and Joseph S. 2012. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, (Eds.). Routledge, 944p.
Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42: 421-428.
Loganathan P., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., and Naidu R. 2012. Cadmium sorption and desorption in soils: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42: 489-533.
Mendez A., Paz-Ferreiro J., Araujo F., and Gascó G. 2014. Biochar from pyrolysis of deinking paper sludge and its use in the treatment of a nickel polluted soil. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 107: 46-52.
Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. 3rd Ed. In: Sparks, D.L., et al., (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3- chemical methods and microbiological properties. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 961-1010.
Olsen S.R.C., Cole V., Watanabe F.S., and Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Cir, US Govern printing office, Washing ton, DC, 939 p.
Pellera F.M., and Gidarakos E. 2015. Effect of dried olive pomace–derived biochar on the mobility of cadmium and nickel in soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 87: 38-45.
Rhoades J.D., Sparks D.L., Page A.L., Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., and Sumner M.E. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3-Chemical Methods, pp. 417-435.
Song W., and Guo M. 2012. Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 94: 138-145.
Thomas G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: D.L. Sparks et al., (Eds) Methods of Soil Analysis. part 3-American Society of Agronomy., Madison. WI, pp. 475- 490.
Yuan J.H., Xu R.K., and Zhang H. 2011. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 102:3488–3497.
Zhang X., Wang H., He L., Lu K., Sarmah A., Li J., Bolan N.S., Pei J., and Huang H. 2013. Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 20:8472–8483.
تحقیقات کاربردی خاک
دوره 8، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 3
آذر 1399
صفحه 68-82
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 20 آبان 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 26 آبان 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 آذر 1399
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار